# ADM483EAR-1 vs. ADM483EAR

**URL:** <https://forum.digikey.com/t/adm483ear-1-vs-adm483ear/23387>\
**Category:** Integrated Circuits (ICs)\
**Tags:** analog-devices, part-comparison\
**Created:** [June 27, 2022, 7:06pm UTC](https://forum.digikey.com/t/adm483ear-1-vs-adm483ear/23387 "2022-06-27T19:06:31Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bmarasco](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/5f8ce5/32.png) [@bmarasco](https://forum.digikey.com/u/bmarasco)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2022, 7:06pm UTC](https://forum.digikey.com/t/adm483ear-1-vs-adm483ear/23387/1 "2022-06-27T19:06:31Z")

</div>

DigiKey/ Rochester show Analog Devices PN:ADM483EAR-1 but Anaolog Device’s specification doesn’t list “-1” as an option.  
Is it the same as ADM483EAR ?  
Thank you for your help~

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Steven\_14444](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/digikey/user_avatar/forum.digikey.com/steven_14444/32/47465_2.png) [@Steven\_14444](https://forum.digikey.com/u/Steven_14444)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2022, 7:21pm UTC](https://forum.digikey.com/t/adm483ear-1-vs-adm483ear/23387/2 "2022-06-27T19:21:21Z")

</div>

Welcome to the TechForum!

Yes, the part is the same as ADM483EAR.
