Label discrepancy

Interconnect Cables, Wires
1

We purchased item 192288-0R3 but the item we received got the label 192288G-0R3. Could you clarify this?

2

Hello,
Welcome to the DigiKey TechForum. I don’t any reference to part 192288G-0R3 being a valid number. Can you send us a photo of the label so we can check into this further.

3

image
image1197×519 89.7 KB

4

Hi Steve, pls refer to the attached image

5

Thanks for the photos. I have sent a request to the manufacturer for verification and will post the information when I receive it.

6

Hi Steve,

Please get back to us by the end of this week. Our production schedule is fast approaching, and we are running out of time to finalize our plans.

Thank you,

7

Sorry for the delay, I’m working on it. I have contacted the manufacturer 3 times with this request and will post when I get it.

8

Hi Steve

Could you update me the status of this request? Thank you

9

Hi Kalina,
Sorry but I have no information to provide for this. I have not received information but it’s unlikely the G has any relevance to the function of the part.

10

It seems that NI is a little loose with their part numbering.

Looking at their product page here, they show the part number we show as 192288-0R3, along with a few other names/numbers, including:

  • SH SCSI68M-VHDCI68M EPM Cable
  • SHC68-C68-EPM
  • 192288-0R3

image
image849×409 40.1 KB

If you scroll down a ways on that page, there’s a link to a drawing under “Resources”:

image
image467×193 6.25 KB

If you click on that link, a new page opens and you can find a pdf link to a drawing. The title for that drawing, in the lower right corner, is “SCH68-68M-EPM”. I note that that is one of the part numbers printed on the cable that you received.

image
image1221×566 37.1 KB

This is all to say that it’s highly likely that you have the correct cable. They seem to use several different numbers to represent this cable.