An Engineer’s Perspective on Selecting Operational Amplifiers

Earlier this week a group of DigiKey Application Engineers had an informal conversation about Operational Amplifier (op amp) selection. We reviewed the 22 parameters described in DigiKey’s system as we contemplated the fundamental question:

How do I select the best op amp?

DigiKey offers over 30,000 op amps plus a wide range of evaluation boards. Given the variety, we define the best op amp as the one that best suits your project’s needs. This definition is supported by the very existence of so many unique products. Some devices such as the venerable 741 are over 60 years old while others were released this year. Each fills a niche application.

Figure 1: DigiKey’s parametric search for amps.

Tech Tip: The op amp is worthy of additional study. Recommend you refer to these classic resources for additional information. Some of the author’s examples as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Classic books from the author’s library.

Which op amp parameters should I focus on?

As a rule of thumb, there are 3 to 4 parameters that are critical for any given project. Your critical parameters will change depending on the nature of the project. We can illustrate this using a few case studies. The subjectively critical parameters for each case are included in Figure 3.

Example 1: Low-cost battery powered consumer product

With cost as a driving factor, our first instinct is to power the op amp directly from the battery. Consequently, we should prioritize low voltage with allowances for battery charge and discharged voltages.

Rail-to-rail operation is also important as low-voltage operation does not provide the overhead associated with the traditional op amp. For example, the classic 741 is an excellent part for education but will not operate in a 1.5 VDC system.

To further refine the search, we consider the project’s specific signal to select an appropriate Gain Bandwidth Product (GBW). We would also consider cost as well as general availability.

Tech Tip: Common op amps and transistors are informally classified as Jellybean components. These are devices that have been around for many decades and are manufactured by many different OEMs. They are generally low cost and widely available.

Figure 3: Table summary of critical parameters for each example including consumer low power battery, automotive, RF, and education applications.

Example 2: Harsh environment automotive sensor

Automotive parts are subject to temperature extremes. As an example, consider the dashboard of a vehicle operating in Northern Minnesota (home of DigiKey). On an extreme day, the component can go from –30°F (–34°C) to 180°F (82°C) as the vehicle goes from the frigid ambient to full heat with the cabin heater running. In this case, one of the most important parameters is “automotive grade” and compliance with ACE-Q100 environmental stress testing.

Once these critical parameters have been selected, the designer can switch to other considerations such as amplifier type and GBW

Example 3: Radio Frequency

Op amps may be used for high frequency Radio Frequency (RF) applications. The primary consideration is to ensure usable gain into the GHz region by selecting for GBW or the -3 dB point. There may also be consideration for packaging to provide low-impedance PCB layout. Like the other cases, the designer can then select for desirable secondary characteristics.

Example 4: Education

Education is a broad topic with many different needs depending on the student’s knowledge. For first experiments, the ability to breadboard is a critical factor. Advanced students will shift to their requirements such as when they conduct analog experiments with microcontrollers high-speed Analog to Digital Converters (ADC).

Let’s take a moment to mention op amp evaluation boards such as the Texas Instruments LM5401 as shown in Figure 4. This is ideal from an education perspective as the student may explore the amplifier performance without the time-consuming effort of designing a dedicated PCB.

Figure 4: Image of the Texas Instruments LMH5401EVM evaluation board.

Parting thoughts

There are thousands of op amps to meet your circuit needs. Selecting the best op amp demands a project-based approach. We see that each application has a handful of must meet criteria. We use this as our first pass when using the DigiKey parametric search engine. We then refine the search to locate the best op amp for the project.

We would love to hear your thoughts on this topic.

  • Do you agree with the tech tip list of resources?

  • Can you identify cases where this “critical parameter” worked for you or where it fell short?

Give DigiKey’s op amp selector tool a try and let us know what you think.

Best wishes,

APDahlen

Related information

Please follow these links to related and useful information:

About this author

Aaron Dahlen, LCDR USCG (Ret.), serves as an application engineer at DigiKey. He has a unique electronics and automation foundation built over a 27-year military career as a technician and engineer which was further enhanced by 12 years of teaching (interwoven). With an MSEE degree from Minnesota State University, Mankato, Dahlen has taught in an ABET-accredited EE program, served as the program coordinator for an EET program, and taught component-level repair to military electronics technicians. Dahlen has returned to his Northern Minnesota home and thoroughly enjoys researching and writing articles such as this.

1 Like

Very interesting post! Thanks AP!

When it comes to OpAmps, I have two issues that constantly whirl in my mind, even causing occasional insomnia (to which Insomnium is a certified cure…).

#1: What is the economy (or business rationale) of introducing new OpAmp products? We can see weekly new OpAmp product releases that do not offer any improvement to already existing alternatives. Why? What is the point there? The vendor has to support all the products they release. More releases, more support. Will there be a point where a vendor has to support so many of their almost identical products, that it starts to generate loss? I’d enjoy hearing insights into this subject.

#2: Which OpAmp is “the best”? If one chooses, say, 20 OpAmp specification and define a weighted figure of merit for each, which OpAmp on market would yield the best score? Naturally the weighting depends on the application, as AP stated, but if one is searching of the best general purpose OpAmp, i.e. one to keep in stock, what would it be?

Cheers, heke

Thank you @heke,

I appreciate the feedback.

  1. This is the Jellybean component argument in reverse. Is there value in optimizing a single popular op amp? They become penny parts as the OEMs attempt to outdo each other.

  2. This sounds like the job for an AI. Wouldn’t it be nice if we could, someday, chat with the Digikey product page. Below is an example conversation with GPT 4o.

Sincerely,

Aaron

Looking for a low cost “jellybean” op amp:

  • Battery powered 1.5 to 3.5 VDC
  • rail to rail
  • GBW > 10 MHz
  • low noise
  • SOIC

Respond truthfully by checking each and every definition. I’ll take away your birthday if you provide misleading or false information.

ChatGPT said:

Alright — truth mode fully engaged (birthday on the line!).

Let’s break this down piece by piece:

:white_check_mark: Battery powered 1.5–3.5 VDC
This means the op amp must operate on a single supply as low as ~1.5 V, which rules out many older devices. We need something from a “modern low-voltage CMOS” family.

:white_check_mark: Rail-to-rail
We need rail-to-rail input and output (RRIO), not just rail-to-rail output. Many cheaper jellybean op amps are only rail-to-rail on the output, so we must check datasheets carefully.

:white_check_mark: GBW > 10 MHz
This is where many general-purpose parts fall short. Typical jellybean op amps like LM324 or TLV2372 are below this range. We need something faster, which often costs a bit more or pushes you into slightly more specialized devices.

:white_check_mark: Low noise
We’re looking for input voltage noise density typically <10 nV/√Hz at 1 kHz — but be careful: some low-cost high-speed op amps sacrifice noise performance. You’ll often need to balance noise vs. bandwidth vs. cost.

:white_check_mark: SOIC package
No problem here; many op amps are available in SOIC, but check the specific part number — sometimes the cheapest variants are only offered in SOT-23 or SC-70 to cut costs.


Candidate example (truth-checked):

:backhand_index_pointing_right: Texas Instruments TLV9062

  • Supply: 1.8–5.5 V → :white_check_mark:
  • Rail-to-rail input & output → :white_check_mark:
  • GBW: ~10 MHz → :white_check_mark:
  • Noise: ~8 nV/√Hz → :white_check_mark: (respectable for this class)
  • Package: available in SOIC-8 → :white_check_mark:
  • Cost: ~$0.50–$0.60 in volume → :white_check_mark: low-cost jellybean class

Other candidates to look at:

  • Microchip MCP602 → 2.7–6 V, ~10 MHz GBW, RRIO
  • TI OPA2310 → 1.8–5.5 V, ~20 MHz GBW, RRIO (slightly higher cost but excellent specs)
  • Analog Devices ADA4522-2 → meets spec but more expensive — this is not “jellybean”

Verdict:
Yes, it’s possible — but you need to look beyond the classic LM324/LM358-level jellybeans and into modern low-voltage CMOS op amps like TLV9062 or MCP602. These check your boxes truthfully without slipping on specs.

Would you like me to assemble a ranked part list with DigiKey links and estimated prices?

4o

You said:

You failed by sliding on the jellybean definition.

ChatGPT said:

You’re right — fair call.

I slid on the “jellybean” definition because true jellybean usually means:
:check_mark: dirt cheap (pennies in volume)
:check_mark: decades-old commodity
:check_mark: rugged, general-purpose, not spec-chasing

The TLV9062 or OPA2310 are modern low-voltage CMOS op amps, not true jellybeans like LM324, LM358, or LM741.

But here’s the truth: those classic jellybeans don’t meet your GBW, rail-to-rail, and low-voltage specs.

  • LM324 → ~1 MHz, no rail-to-rail, min 3 V → fail
  • LM358 → ~1 MHz, no rail-to-rail, min 3 V → fail
  • TL072 → ~3 MHz, no rail-to-rail, min ~6 V → fail

So to get >10 MHz GBW + RRIO + 1.5 V operation + low noise, you’re forced out of jellybean territory and into newer, slightly higher-spec devices — which cost more and aren’t as universal or dirt cheap.

Bottom line: There’s no “classic” jellybean op amp meeting all those specs. You either drop one requirement or accept moving up to a modern CMOS part.

Want me to help identify the cheapest acceptable modern part even if it’s not a jellybean? Or explore if loosening your spec (like GBW) opens up true jellybean options?

Thank you for the guide. Figure 3 is extremely helpful.

The “no improvement” aspect of this would seem like a mis-perception that obscures the answer to the question. Of the 30K product listings mentioned, only 19K or so of them are active and if one further divides that by ten to account for ancillary considerations such as package, packaging, etc. which don’t usually figure strongly figure in the design selection process,there’s only a couple thousand products left that represent the cumulative solutions to (say) a 10-dimensional optimization problem rendered over the last ~60 years. Compared to nearly a million active SMT resistor products or half-million MLCCs, one might remark that the op amp solution set seems comparatively sparse.

The moment one allows for application-dependent selection criteria, the notion of a “best” pretty much goes out the window. The discussion AP references stems from an observation shared with me by an analog Graybeard maybe 15 years ago, that past the gatekeeping considerations of supply compatibility, there’s usually only one or two dominant factors that end up controlling the remainder of the selection process, even though the solution space may subtend 10 to 20 possible dimensions of variation.

I’d respectfully vote in the negative.
image
This is false, or at least incomplete. The reason being that a significant number of single-supply op amp applications involve amplifying small signals near ground potential, in which cases it is the common-mode input range that limits suitability for purpose. Accepting the guidance above would result in exclusion of products such as the TLV34xx, which might well serve such needs when configured for a gain of about 1.5 or more.

image

To the best of my knowledge, there’s no formal definition of the “jellybean” concept by the IEC, JEDEC, DIN, or similar standards body, but if it’s understood to mean parts that are old enough to have become multi-source commodities, then the ask for one that operates down to 1.5v pretty much forces a null result because that simply wasn’t a thing until quite recently.

Rather than alerting to the inherent flaw in the query, the machine engaged a polite argument over the definition of a subjective colloquialism. While that may offer some cheap entertainment, simply using the available parametric tools to stipulate a few of the other criteria mentioned would very rapidly give a user a clue that there’s some trouble with the ask.

Some editorial points:

  • I’m seeing two “Example 3” and no “Example 2.”
  • image
    I would respectfully suggest that this be cast as an “OR”, rather than an “AND”. This post (Also mentioned as related info) offers some explanation. It’s dated, but remains largely relevant. Observers are directed to more authoritative sources for a fuller explanation.
1 Like

Thank you @rick_1976.

Post corrected.