Linear vs Logarithmic Potentiometer Test

Most potentiometers will not list on the body of the pot if it is Linear or Logarithmic and it is often a question that is hard to answer for our customers. If the pot they have is still functioning you can often tell which you have by doing a simple resistance test on the potentiometer. Below I done a test on two similar 10K pots from TT Electronics to help demonstrate the differences.

First I have a Linear part P160KNP-0EC15B10K. In the first picture I have the shaft turned completely to the left and you can see I am almost to 0. The second picture I have the shaft turned to the mid-point and you can see I am at approx 5K. Then the last picture I am turned completely to the right and I am at 10K.
imageimageimage

Now lets look at part P160KNP-0EC15A10K which is a Logarithmic pot. Again I turn the shaft completely to the left and I am at almost 0. I then turn the shaft to the mid point and this is where I see the difference. At the midpoint you see I am only at 1.67K. (Depending on the curve you may also see a high number in the middle). Last I turn all the way to the right and again I am at 10K.

imageimageimage

Here is a Chart that Bourns offers with their PDB241-GTR Series of Pots. As you can see the A2 and C2 tapers would be Logarithmic and The B0 would be a linear taper.

1 Like

Your opening statement here is simply not correct. Every pot I have seen had a prefix to the ohmic value being A, B or C. They are marked for example, as A10k for a 10k log pot. Even the part numbers you quoted (not the Bournes ‘series’, but actual part numbers have exactly that built right into them). The first part number you quoted ends in B10k (linear) and B10k would be printed on the body of the pot. The second number you quoted ends in A10k which is log. For completeness, C is used for anti log.
A helpful article is good, but one that deals in misinformation is definitely not good.